50th Meeting of the GEFCouncil and CSO Meetings
Theme: ICCAs and Standards and Safeguards for Finance and Business
Meeting dates:
- 5 June 2016: Preparatory meeting for CSOs
- 6 June 2016: CSO Consultation with GEF Council
- 7-9 June 2016: 50th GEF Council Meeting
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Consortium activities: |
- Several Consortium members, including the Global Forest Coalition and an honorary member, participated as part of the GEF CSO-Network
- CSO-Network prepared statements on specific agenda items. Full text of all GEF CSO-Network statements can be downloaded from their summary report. For Consortium, most relevant include:
- Recommendations for strengthening monitoring of Agency compliance with GEF Policies on environmental and social safeguards, gender, and fiduciary standards (Agenda Item no. 6)
- Recommendation that GEF Work Program incorporate appropriate recognition of and support for land and territories governed by indigenous peoples and local communities, in line with self-determined priorities and plans (Agenda Item no. 17)
|
Key Policy Outcomes: |
Council Decisions included:
- Provisional approval of GEF Trust Fund Work Program
- Agreement on need for periodic self and third-party assessment of Agency compliance, with reporting on self-assessment to take place each replenishment cycle; the Secretariat will further report in October 2016
- Approved proposed arrangements for establishing Capacity-Building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT) under UNFCCC (Paris Agreement)
- Agreed to establish ad-hoc working group to develop an updated vision for the GEF-civil society relationship; will report back at the first 2017 Council meeting
|
More Information: |
|
Contribution to overall strategy: |
Under the draft strategy on “ICCAs & Standards & Safeguards for Finance & Business”, the above activities contributed to the objectives of: (1) recognition of ICCAs as ‘prime targets’ but also ‘safe spaces’ where companies respect customary / local rules and procedures; and (2) recognition of indigenous peoples’ and communities’ rights and environmental concerns in policies of financial institutions |
Direct financial implications for the Consortium: |
None – self-funded by Consortium members and volunteer contributions by Honorary member |